Everything Trump does is ‘ridiculous’

Donald Trump is definitely not my favorite president. And actually, he’s no one’s favorite president, right? At least in Europe. Or should I say in European media? Most leading newspapers, television programs and other sources of news in Europe share the same (sometimes covered) frame when it comes to news about Trump: he’s no good, he can’t rule and Europe stands against him. This tendency was especially visible in newsitems on Trump’s handshake. More (other) articles herehere, and here

According to Schuck and Feinholdt, through interaction between journalists and news organizations, political elites, and the public, news frames eventually take shape (2015: 2). One can argue if that interaction is actually taking place here. That the media, the elites and the public are sharing an argument, instead of having a dialogue.

Does it matter? Yes to me it does. Because even though I agree with this dominant frame about trump, I find myself in an inner conflict. Is the journalists integrity at risk when reporting news in such a frame? One the one hand it could be argued that a journalist should always be as objective as possible. But on the other hand one can believe that by using different frames, journalists remain critical. So the question here is, what is the relationship between framing and objectivity?

Although Schuck and Feinholdt present relevant theories and concepts on framing, the question whether or not the objectivity of the media and journalists is at risk in using frames, unfortunately remains unanswered.

Sozan Toksöz


Schuck, Andreas R.T., and Alina Feinholdt. (2015). News Framing Effects and Emotions. Robert Scott and Stephen Kosslyn (Eds.), Emerging trends in the social and behavioral sciences.




The Guardian

One thought on “Everything Trump does is ‘ridiculous’

  1. I find this issue really interesting. I did read a text for one of my other class, by Daston and Gallison, treating about the question of objectify, and how much in the creation of atlases during the 19th century the will for objectify was important. Those books were made to inform the public on different topics, they were not ‘news’, yet they did inform people on facts that they were not aware of beforehand. I think journalism with issues as the one you highlight here proves that it has lost its informative, its ‘documentary’ side, not informing us anymore in an objective way but creating ‘buzz’ and ‘funny content’. As time flies it looks like entertainment is taking over information and objectivity, so what will be tomorrow’s journalism? The Kardashians and Trump playing golf?

Leave a Reply